Tasmania's Gaming Commission Warns of Potential Harm from New Pokies Policies
The Tasmanian government's recent gambling reforms have sparked concern among experts, who argue that the new policies may inadvertently worsen the situation for problem gamblers. The state's gaming regulator, in a series of letters obtained under right-to-information laws, has expressed deep reservations about the government's approach, particularly regarding the introduction of ATMs and a ticket-in, ticket-out (TITO) system for poker machines.
A Step Backwards in Harm Reduction
The commission's primary worry is that these policies could create greater harm rather than minimize it. They argue that the ready availability of additional cash through ATMs could fuel impulsive gambling behavior, making it easier for individuals to chase their losses. This is especially concerning given the evidence that 'tap and go' and TITO systems can significantly increase the 'spending effect' on pokies.
The commissioners also highlight the potential for money laundering in Tasmanian venues, a risk associated with the TITO system. They suggest that the ease and speed of the TITO process might not protect against harm but could, in fact, exacerbate it. The commission's concerns extend to the staggered opening hours, which they believe could encourage problem gamblers to move from one venue to another, intensifying their harmful behavior.
Lack of Consultation and Expertise
What adds to the controversy is the lack of consultation with the gaming commission. The commissioners were not informed about the new policies before they were taken to cabinet, and they express disappointment that the government has not heeded their warnings. This lack of engagement with the independent, expert body responsible for gambling regulation in Tasmania is seen as a missed opportunity to develop more effective harm reduction strategies.
A Balanced Approach is Key
The commission's letters emphasize the need for a balanced approach to gambling reform. They suggest that the policies should be viewed as a package, with each measure reinforcing the others, rather than as isolated initiatives. For instance, the introduction of ATMs could be used to enforce limits more effectively, but only if it is done in a way that minimizes the potential for harm.
Conclusion: Learning from Mistakes
The Tasmanian government's new pokies policies have raised red flags among experts, who fear they may not achieve the intended harm reduction goals. The gaming commission's warnings highlight the importance of a comprehensive and carefully considered approach to gambling reform. It is crucial to learn from past mistakes and engage with independent experts to ensure that policies are effective and do not inadvertently cause more harm than good.
